Hi Blog Group!
I wholeheartedly agree with
Akash’s comment about it being difficult to narrow down my various interests to
just one potential research question. I
think this is, in large part, why I’ve decided not to pursue the thesis option
in the MI program! It’s also what
attracted me to the prospect of working in libraries in general. As someone who has always has a tough time
trying to focus on just one area of interest, it seemed like a career that
would allow me to continually learn about a variety of topics.
When I tried to carry out
the exercise that Luker suggests at the end of Chapter 1, I was able to come up
with dozens of questions, but found myself tripping over a number of potential
roadblocks. Most notably, the question
of who my research might benefit – who the ‘stakeholders’ might be. I could easily prattle off a list of research
questions that sound like fun to me, such as:
How many books are there in the Fisher library that have been banned
over the centuries, and why? What are the
intellectual, political or even aesthetic links between materials that have
been considered dangerous throughout history?
What are the most expensive or extravagant bindings to be found in the
same collection, and to what extent does a book’s material beauty influence the
experience of the reader? Is it possible
to gauge the age of a book from its smell?
What is it about some books that make people cherish them forever (The
content? The cover art? The feeling of the pages? An emotional relationship with the person who
gave it to them?), while other books are sold off, given away, or used as
doorstops and to prop open windows? What do the notes in the margins of a book
indicate to us about its reader? I could
go on forever, but the problem with these kinds of questions, for me, is that I
suspect that the answers might also only be interesting or beneficial to me, or
at best to a limited, rather esoteric circle of likeminded bookish nerds. The questions themselves also seem rather
limited in their scope.
So in an attempt to come up
with a research idea that would be of some benefit to a larger portion of the
population, I began thinking about oral history and its place in libraries and
archives. A very cursory google search
seemed to indicate that there is no archive or other form of repository for
personal accounts or oral histories in Toronto, or even in Ontario. There are storytelling events and festivals,
but these seem to be more focused on personal anecdotes, or fictional tales, or
reading existing books aloud, rather than a documentation of history from the
perspective of an individual. I feel
like it might be an interesting project to try to record people’s accounts of
events in Toronto’s history, or perhaps to tie the accounts to physical locations
in the city. The end product could perhaps be a
website, where the user could click on a variety of interactive locations on a
map of Toronto, and hear an account of what it was like to work on the
construction crew that built the Bloor viaduct, or to have arrived at the
Toronto harbor after having fled Europe during WWII, or to have lived in
Kensington Market in 1930? It could also
serve as an educational tool for teaching students about Toronto history.
It’s a very preliminary idea
at the moment, and I have no idea yet what sort of methodological framework I
might use to carry out this research.
But hopefully the next few classes and further reading of Luker and
Knight will point me in the right direction. I also welcome any comments or suggestions
that the discussion group may have.
Hi Lauren, I think your research idea is very interesting! I did some volunteering with the Multicultural History Society of Ontario (MHSO) transcribing oral history interviews for an online repository. It was really exciting, especially because of the multi-lingual aspect. The interviews reflect the diverse languages spoken in Canada by a range of ethno-cultural groups. I thought you may be interested to look at an oral history online database, as you mention in your post. MHSO has one currently at http://www.mhso.ca/online.html. They are also in the process of putting together a much larger database of oral history interviews, and may be open to having you take a look before it is ready to be launched online.
ReplyDeleteAll the best with the research!
Interesting topic Lauren. I am thinking along similar lines with my research, as I am interested in doing something like an oral history record of my grandmother's life (though, like you, I am struggling to define who the "stakeholders" are in this research). Oral history is an interesting area of research because I think it really underscores the ephemeral nature of information. There are so many great first hand accounts that are lost because they are not recorded. And once those people are gone, those stories are gone. The same is true with books. Recently, my mother's basement flooded, and she threw out a whole collection of old (published in 1919) encyclopedias that (she said) got a little damp. I am a little heart broken that now, though their information was a bit dated, I can't look to those books for their view of the past. Books can be like people: the knowledge and stories that they contain are unique and worth preserving.
DeleteThank you J. and Paul for the responses! I wish I had noticed them sooner.
DeleteJ. - thank you for the excellent suggestion to check out the MHSO oral history repository. I actually ended up stumbling across it while researching the SSRHC proposal, and loved listening to the stories. I also love the map interface that they used, it ended up inspiring the layout for my final project as an interactive map of Toronto.
Paul - I'm sorry to hear about those encyclopedias that were lost! That is a shame indeed. If I had read this post back when we were formulating our research questions, I would have encouraged you to forge ahead with recording an oral history of your grandmother's life. The research I've conducted over the course of this class had indicated to me that libraries and archives are always interested in acquiring new oral histories, so this would open up your pool of stakeholders significantly.