Like
Prof. Alan Galey, my fieldwork space, the archive, is the seeming anti-thesis
to the field (galeyinf1240.blogspot.ca/2013/10/week-6-follow-up-and-week-7-blogging.html).
I anticipate for my research project to scour the archives of cultural
institutions, publishing houses and newspapers across Beirut. In this space, I
too hope to be surprised and illuminated (ibid). Yet in a sense, all of Beirut
is my fieldwork space, since my research concerns a phenomenon whose history is
inextricably tied to that of Lebanon’s ancient capital. The archives I will be
visiting will take me from one end of Beirut to the other, as I examine the
social and cultural networks of the print culture I am studying. In a sense, I
will be physically retracing these relationships, crossing streets and climbing
stairwells that many Shi’r’s poets
once crossed and climbed in bygone times. Or, put another way, one can
conceptualize the entirety of Beirut as one core component of the much larger
and fluid Shi’r Archive. One can
extend the parameters of that Archive even further, beyond Beirut; and imagine
it stretching past the coast and over the mountains in all directions until it
encompasses the entire world. For the Archive, in Derrida’s sense, is a totality
far greater than any one repository can contain (Brothman, 1999). Hence, the Shi’r Archive includes not only the
official repositories with cultural and other institutions, but also all the
places the poets gathered; where each of them drank coffee or played as a child;
the people they spoke to or the readers they inspired; and even perhaps the
personal archive of a scholar in New York or Johannesburg that contains related
materials.
Here,
I have in mind the book A Prisoner in the
Garden that I am currently reading in preparing my final research proposal,
and that is about an archival exhibition in Johannesburg with the same name.
This beautifully illustrated book by the Nelson Mandela Foundation documents that
exhibition project, which was run by the Foundation’s Nelson Mandela Centre of
Memory and Commemoration (with Verne Harris was the project manager). The
following passage in particular is relevant to my discussion here:
“The
very idea of the Nelson Mandela Centre of Memory and Commemoration suggests a
Mandela Archive. But whereas a conventional archive has a single location and a
finite number of documents, the Mandela Archive is an infinite one, located in
innumerable places. It is also not confined to documents, but includes sites,
landscapes, material objects, performances, photographs, artworks, stories and
the memories of individuals.
“The
list is endless, and the full scope of the Mandela Archive is difficult to
comprehend. […] No listing of the Mandela Archive can, however, be considered
complete or do more than suggest the enormity of its scope and complexity. […]
The Mandela Archive connects to a host of other archives in powerful ways.
While necessarily focusing on Mandela, it also embraces other elements of
history of which he has become a symbol. […] Mandela’s personal history is also
that of not only his close comrades, but all who identified with the struggles
against apartheid, and is echoed in all the records they generated, in their
many and varied forms.” (2005, 35-36)
This
passage encourages us, like Derrida did, to think in new ways about the archive
as a site of memory and scholarship. It also inspires thoughts about the
complex and myriad connections between what things that may appear as disparate
and unrelated at first, but are in fact ultimately connected. In studying
social phenomena, however, we must draw the line somewhere, establishing the
boundaries of our inquiry so that it is manageable. One cannot study all things
at once. Yet it is important to remember that wherever that line is drawn, always
there are connections, relationships, voices and facets that are left unaccounted
for in any research project. I think that is a humbling but constructive idea
to keep in mind as one undertakes research. (As an aside, the organization
subsequently shortened its name to the Nelson Mandela Centre of Memory.)
On
a slightly different note, one of my favourite articles about research,
including fieldwork, concerns its potential to challenge scholars to confront
their assumptions, and engage with the subject of their study (ibid). This
well-known article was written by noted critical scholar, Patti Lather (1986).
In it, she defines the concept of “research praxis” as she examines the
methodological implications of critical theory. Lather’s article highlights the
potential of field research, when designed critically, to advance emancipatory
knowledge. One of my favourite parts of the article is the following:
“Reciprocity
in research design is a matter of both intent and degree. Regarding intent,
reciprocity has long been recognized as a valuable condition of research fieldwork,
for it has been found to create conditions which generate rich data (Wax,
1952). Everhart (1977), for example, presents reciprocity as "an excellent
data gathering technique" (p. 10) because the researcher moves from the status
of stranger to friend and thus is able to gather personal knowledge from
subjects more easily. […] I argue that we must go beyond the concern for more
and better data to a concern for research as praxis. What I suggest is that we
consciously use our research to help participants understand and change their
situations.” (ibid, 263)
Hence,
Lather is concerned with the democratization of the research process, and
conducting fieldwork in a manner that empowers both scholar and, as applicable,
research subjects. These research ideas interest me, as I continue developing
my project and its methods.
References
Brothman,
Brien. (Fall 1999). Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation
of
Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria 48: 64-88.
Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria 48: 64-88.
Lather,
Patti. (Fall 1986). Research as Praxis. Harvard
Educational Review 56(3): 257-278.
Nelson
Mandela Centre of Memory. (2005) A Prisoner in
The Garden. New York, New York:
Viking Studio.
Viking Studio.
No comments:
Post a Comment