I’m a bit disappointed that I chose to spend last week’s
blog talking about analyzing the book object as an artifact, as it would have
applied perfectly to this week’s question!
But there are certainly plenty of other artifacts and texts that would
be interesting to study. Like Prof.
Galey’s example of the Joseph Wright painting in the Bond film, I think it
would be interesting to conduct a study of a number of famous artworks that can
be seen in the background of popular movies over the past, say, 40 years. This would likely lend itself to a fun
analysis of referential, implicit and symptomatic readings of the individual
films, and might also paint a broader picture (yes, pun intended) of the
development and changes of background composition and aesthetic tastes over the
decades.
As I’m writing this post, I’m scanning the living room of my
house for other artifacts that could be studied, and I’m surprised (and a bit
delighted) by the number of objects within ten feet of me that I would
seriously consider researching. A close reading
of a clock would be interesting, as one could extrapolate the mechanics of the
individual clock into an analysis of the changes in clock design and use over
time. This could perhaps parallel an
analysis of humanity’s notions of and relationship to time, and could also
delve into literary representations of watches, clocks, ticking time bombs, and
so on. I’m reminded, for example, of
Samuel Pepys (1633-1703) constantly checking his watch as noted in his diaries,
or the use of temporal constraints used in the literary experiments of the
Oulipo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oulipo).
Works Cited
Pepys, S. (1932). Samuel Pepys’ diary. New York:
Grosset & Dunlap.
No comments:
Post a Comment