I’ve done a few years of
research in psychology labs and I always anticipated I would have a career in
quantitative research. For the past 2.5
years, I’ve held positions in data librarianship for Scholars Portal and, more
recently, the Map & Data Library.
My undergraduate psychology
thesis considered system justification theory.
This theory concerns the human tendency to believe that social systems
are fair, just, and equal – in other words, people are motivated to justify the
status quo. In my research, we tested
the relationship between said system justification measures and collective
group self-esteem. In the end, we found
no statistically significant (P<0.05) relationship between our
variables. However, our results did show
that our study participants endorsed system justification and just world beliefs
– so a win for the broader SJ theory, and a loss for our particular experiment.
I believe social psychology
is invaluable because it does use quantitative, experimental measures to
investigate social phenomenon – unlike sociology or other social science
disciplines that are less experimentally based.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A
decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and
unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6),
881-919.
Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system
justification and the palliative function of ideology. European review of
social psychology, 13(1), 111-153.
No comments:
Post a Comment